Verus-AI Research
Up-and-Coming Real Estate Markets in 2026
Up-and-coming markets at the tract level: demographic momentum and Verus-AI scores across 7,233 scoreable tracts in 13 metros.
Overview
Where the model sees value
The Verus-AI emerging-score ranking identifies census tracts where single-year demographic momentum, measured primarily through income and educational-attainment shifts, has accelerated sharply relative to the tract's longer-run trajectory. Across the 7,233 scoreable tracts across 13 major U.S. metros, the leading entry is Roswell in Atlanta, with an emerging score of 109.85, a figure that sits meaningfully above the model's nominal 100-point reference level and reflects an income year-over-year gain of 185.44%. The second and third entries, West Campus in Austin (104.46) and Westchase in Houston (103.82), also clear 100, as does Medical Center in Houston (100.69). Below those four, the ranked list drops sharply: the fifth entry, Tract 9204 in Dallas-Fort Worth, scores 67.95.
That four-entry cluster above 100 is the most analytically significant structural feature of the ranking among the 15 tracts in the emerging-score table. It suggests the top four are driven by unusually sharp single-year demographic moves rather than broad-based momentum distributed evenly across the ranked set.
Phoenix carries the highest mean Verus score among the 13 curated launch metros at 64.02, yet contributes only one tract to the top 15 emerging entries. Atlanta, whose mean Verus score of 52.65 places it near the lower end of the metro table, contributes the single highest emerging score in the ranked set. That asymmetry is discussed further in the What the Data Shows section.
The ranking
Up-and-coming tracts across major U.S. metros by demographic momentum
| Rank | Tract | Area | Metro | Emerging Score | Income YoY | Education YoY | 5-Yr Forecast | Verus-AI Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13121010214 | Roswell | Atlanta | 109.8 | +185.4% | -3.5% | +29.6% | 66 |
| 2 | 48453000606 | West Campus | Austin | 104.5 | +94.1% | +119.9% | +17.4% | 51 |
| 3 | 48201452204 | Westchase | Houston | 103.8 | +173.5% | -0.8% | +23.4% | 47 |
| 4 | 48201314401 | Medical Center | Houston | 100.7 | +167.8% | +0.1% | +25.1% | 53 |
| 5 | 48113009204 | Tract 9204 | Dallas-Fort Worth | 68.0 | +11.2% | +153.0% | +37.0% | 64 |
| 6 | 04013110001 | Tract 0001 | Phoenix | 64.7 | +14.7% | +139.8% | +37.0% | 70 |
| 7 | 12057010824 | University | Tampa | 64.5 | +111.0% | -5.2% | +29.3% | 60 |
| 8 | 37119003802 | Tract 3802 | Charlotte | 62.6 | +14.9% | +134.1% | +37.0% | 70 |
| 9 | 48201222100 | Aldine | Houston | 60.7 | +18.3% | +124.2% | +37.0% | 76 |
| 10 | 48201230100 | Kashmere Gardens | Houston | 50.5 | +0.1% | +126.1% | +23.2% | 42 |
| 11 | 12057013602 | Palm River-Clair Mel | Tampa | 45.5 | +16.6% | +88.8% | +37.0% | 70 |
| 12 | 48453002327 | Montopolis | Austin | 44.1 | +74.4% | -1.2% | +8.9% | 48 |
| 13 | 48339692201 | Tract 2201 | Houston | 41.7 | +1.6% | +102.0% | +37.0% | 57 |
| 14 | 48201311001 | East End | Houston | 40.7 | +16.5% | +77.0% | +37.0% | 62 |
| 15 | 48491020340 | Leander | Austin | 40.3 | +25.8% | +62.1% | +37.0% | 70 |
| Rank | Metro | State | Scored Tracts | Mean Score | Mean 5-Yr Forecast | Pop-Weighted Median Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phoenix | AZ | 998 | 64.0 | +35.3% | $427,690 |
| 2 | Nashville | TN | 170 | 61.3 | +34.8% | $386,000 |
| 3 | Las Vegas | NV | 532 | 60.2 | +33.5% | $406,201 |
| 4 | Austin | TX | 465 | 59.9 | +33.2% | $454,400 |
| 5 | Raleigh | NC | 228 | 59.4 | +34.0% | $446,667 |
| 6 | Tampa | FL | 323 | 58.9 | +33.8% | $356,500 |
| 7 | Dallas-Fort Worth | TX | 1,481 | 58.3 | +32.9% | $339,600 |
| 8 | Charlotte | NC | 302 | 57.9 | +33.7% | $392,500 |
| 9 | San Antonio | TX | 369 | 57.0 | +31.9% | $244,000 |
| 10 | Orlando | FL | 265 | 57.0 | +32.5% | $360,346 |
| 11 | Jacksonville | FL | 218 | 54.3 | +33.0% | $281,200 |
| 12 | Atlanta | GA | 523 | 52.6 | +30.5% | $368,600 |
| 13 | Houston | TX | 1,359 | 51.2 | +28.6% | $272,400 |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Scoreable U.S. tracts | 82,179 |
| National coverage | 84.1% |
| Counties represented | 3,234 |
| Curated launch metros named | 13 |
| Verus-AI score spread (p10 to p90) | 37 to 68 |
| Forecast spread (p10 to p90) | +15.7% to +37.0% |
| Forecast cap | +37.01% (23,955 tracts at the cap) |
Analysis
What is driving the spread
The Verus-AI score is constructed from a 2014-to-2024 history window and produces a 5-year forward estimate covering 2025 through 2029. The model covers 82,179 scoreable U.S. census tracts across 3,234 counties, representing 84.09% of all U.S. tracts. The 13 curated launch metros account for 7,233 of those scoreable tracts. Confidence bands are 80% intervals; they should be read as the range within which the model assigns an 80% probability of the outcome falling, not as guarantees.
The emerging score is a separate construct from the Verus score. Where the Verus score synthesizes a broad set of fundamentals into a 0-to-100 scale, the emerging score is designed to surface tracts where demographic indicators have shifted sharply within a single year. Because it is calibrated to detect acceleration rather than level, it can and does exceed 100, as the top four entries demonstrate. A tract with a high emerging score but a middling Verus score is not necessarily a strong long-run hold; it is a tract where recent demographic data has moved faster than the underlying fundamentals would predict.
The 5-year forecast carries a cap of 37.01%. As of the data vintage used here, 23,955 of the 82,179 scoreable U.S. census tracts are at that cap. The practical consequence is visible in the forecast distribution: the 75th and 90th percentiles of the national forecast distribution are both 37.01%, meaning the upper quarter of all forecasts is compressed against the ceiling. The national forecast median is 30.48%, and the 10th percentile is 15.7%, illustrating the width of the lower tail.
The ranked table below lists 15 tracts sorted by emerging score. The top four entries are separated from the rest of the list by a meaningful gap among the 15 tracts in the emerging-score table: Roswell in Atlanta (109.85), West Campus in Austin (104.46), Westchase in Houston (103.82), and Medical Center in Houston (100.69) all exceed 100, while the fifth-ranked tract, Tract 9204 in Dallas-Fort Worth, scores 67.95. That gap of roughly 33 points between the fourth and fifth entries is the most analytically significant feature of the ranking among the 15 tracts in the emerging-score table and suggests the top four are outliers driven by unusually sharp single-year demographic moves rather than broad-based momentum.
Within the top four, the income and education signals diverge in ways worth noting. Roswell's emerging score is driven almost entirely by income: its income year-over-year gain is 185.44%, while its education year-over-year change is -3.53%. Westchase shows a similar pattern, with an income gain of 173.53% and an education change of -0.75%. Medical Center in Houston records an income gain of 167.75% and an education shift of just 0.09%. West Campus in Austin is the outlier within the top four: its income gain of 94.14% is the smallest of the group, but its education year-over-year gain of 119.94% is the largest, suggesting a different compositional dynamic, likely a shift in the student or young-professional population rather than a broad household income event.
Further down the ranked table, the pattern reverses. Tract 9204 in Dallas-Fort Worth scores 67.95 on the strength of an education gain of 153.03%, while its income gain is only 11.23%. Tract 0001 in Phoenix (64.74) and Tract 3802 in Charlotte (62.57) show similar education-led profiles, with education gains of 139.78% and 134.05% respectively against income gains of 14.71% and 14.91%. Aldine in Houston (60.67) and Kashmere Gardens in Houston (50.49) also show education-led momentum. The lower half of the ranked table is therefore analytically distinct from the top four: it reflects gradual attainment shifts rather than acute income events, and the 5-year forecasts for those tracts are generally higher, several carry forecasts at the 37.01% cap, because their underlying Verus scores are stronger.
The most counter-intuitive finding in the data, among the 13 curated launch metros, is the concentration of high emerging scores in metros that rank toward the lower end of the mean Verus score table. Atlanta's mean Verus score of 52.65 is the second-lowest among the 13 curated launch metros, yet it produces the highest emerging score in the ranked set at 109.85. Houston's mean Verus score of 51.18 is the lowest among the 13 curated launch metros, yet it contributes four of the 15 ranked emerging tracts, including two in the top four. Phoenix, which carries the highest mean Verus score among the 13 curated launch metros at 64.02 and the highest mean 5-year forecast at 35.32%, contributes only one tract to the emerging list.
This pattern is consistent with a structural feature of the emerging score: tracts in markets where the baseline is lower have more room to show sharp single-year acceleration. A tract in a market where median forecasts are already at the 37.01% cap has limited capacity to register a demographically surprising upward move; the model's ceiling constrains the signal. Atlanta and Houston both show median forecasts below the 37.01% cap at the 50th percentile of their respective forecast distributions, Atlanta at 36.66% and Houston at 32.21%, and their lower tails are wider still, Atlanta's 10th-percentile forecast is 17.32% and Houston's is 14.0%, compared to Phoenix's 10th-percentile forecast of 31.58%. That wider dispersion creates more room for individual tracts to stand out on the emerging dimension.
The forecast values for the top four emerging tracts are notably below the cap. Roswell forecasts 29.62% over 5 years; West Campus forecasts 17.37%; Westchase forecasts 23.42%; Medical Center forecasts 25.06%. By contrast, several lower-ranked emerging tracts, Tract 9204 in Dallas-Fort Worth, Tract 0001 in Phoenix, Tract 3802 in Charlotte, Aldine in Houston, East End in Houston, Leander in Austin, Palm River-Clair Mel in Tampa, Tract 2201 in Houston, carry forecasts at the 37.01% cap.
The leading tract's forecast chart illustrates this tension directly. Roswell (Tract 13121010214) carries a current value of $868,200, a Verus score of 66 (grade C+), and a 5-year forecast of 29.62%. The 80% confidence band at the terminal year 2029 runs from $931,037 to $1,360,268, a band width of $429,231. That width reflects genuine model uncertainty about a tract whose observed value series has been volatile: the series ran from $501,100 in 2014 to a peak of $860,300 in 2023 before settling at $868,200 in 2024, with a notable dip to $622,600 in 2022. The income year-over-year gain of 185.44% that drives the emerging score is a single-year observation; whether it persists is precisely what the wide confidence band reflects.
The structured data for this analysis does not include direct rental yield figures at the tract level, so no yield estimates appear in this section. What the data does provide is current value alongside the 5-year forecast, and the combination of those two figures is informative as a proxy for the price-appreciation component of total return, one of the two inputs to yield-adjusted analysis.
Among the top four emerging tracts, the current values span a wide range: Roswell at $868,200, Medical Center at $231,500, Westchase at $105,300, and West Campus at $269,157. The two Houston entries, Westchase and Medical Center, carry current values well below the Houston metro's weighted median value of $272,400, with Westchase at $105,300 sitting substantially below that figure. Tracts with lower absolute values and forecasts at or near the cap tend to offer a different risk-return profile than higher-value tracts with sub-cap forecasts; the ranked table below allows readers to compare these dimensions across all 15 entries.
It is worth noting that several tracts in the broader metro top-tract tables carry current values that suggest meaningful price dispersion within a single metro. In Nashville, for example, Tract 7701 carries a current value of $1,251,004 while Tract 5618 carries $289,800, both with Verus scores in the high-70s to low-80s range and forecasts at the 37.01% cap. That dispersion suggests that within-metro tract selection matters considerably for any yield-oriented analysis, and that metro-level averages mask substantial variation at the tract level.
Outlook
The forward view
The emerging score is explicitly designed to detect single-year demographic acceleration, which makes it sensitive to data revisions and to one-time events that may not persist. The income year-over-year gains for the top four tracts, 185.44% for Roswell, 173.53% for Westchase, 167.75% for Medical Center, and 94.14% for West Campus, are large enough that even partial mean-reversion in the next survey vintage would materially reduce those tracts' emerging scores. Readers should treat the emerging score as a signal of recent change, not a forecast of continued change.
The 80% confidence bands widen substantially over the forecast horizon. For the leading tract, Roswell, the band width grows from $155,234 in the first forecast year (2025) to $429,231 by 2029. That widening is a feature of the model, not a defect: it reflects the compounding of uncertainty over time. Institutional users should apply their own scenario analysis to the terminal-year estimates rather than treating the point forecast as a central case with narrow variance.
The forecast cap of 37.01% introduces a structural asymmetry that affects cross-tract comparisons. A tract forecasting 37.01% may have a true model expectation above that figure; the cap truncates the upper tail. Conversely, tracts with sub-cap forecasts, such as West Campus at 17.37% or Montopolis at 8.86%, are not subject to that truncation and their forecasts may be read more directly. Any ranking that combines capped and uncapped forecasts should account for this asymmetry.
Climate, flood, and insurance considerations are not incorporated into the Verus score or the emerging score as presented here. Several of the highest-ranked emerging tracts are located in metros with known exposure to weather-related risk; the data does not characterize that risk, and this analysis does not extend to insurance or lending implications beyond what the structured data provides. The history window of 2014 to 2024 includes periods of significant weather events in several of the covered metros, and observed value series may already reflect some of that impact, but no explicit adjustment is made.
Coverage is 84.09% of all U.S. census tracts. The 15.91% of tracts not covered by the model are excluded from all rankings and distributions. Results should not be generalized to the full national tract universe without accounting for that gap. Within the 13 curated launch metros, coverage is as reported in the metro rollup tables; Jacksonville, with 218 scoreable tracts, is the smallest covered metro by tract count, while Dallas-Fort Worth, with 1,481 scoreable tracts, is the largest among the 13 curated launch metros.
Frequently asked
Questions
- What is the highest emerging score in the ranked data, and which tract holds it?
- Among the 7,233 scoreable tracts across 13 major U.S. metros, the highest emerging score is 109.85, held by Roswell in Atlanta. That score is driven primarily by an income year-over-year gain of 185.44%, with an education year-over-year change of -3.53%.
- Which metro has the highest mean Verus score among the 13 curated launch metros?
- Phoenix carries the highest mean Verus score among the 13 curated launch metros at 64.02, and also the highest mean 5-year forecast at 35.32%. Its median forecast is at the 37.01% cap, indicating that the upper half of the Phoenix market is already at the model's ceiling.
- How should the 5-year forecast cap of 37.01% be interpreted?
- The model applies a forecast cap of 37.01%, and 23,955 of the 82,179 scoreable U.S. census tracts are at that cap. Tracts at the cap may have a true model expectation above that figure; the cap truncates the upper tail, which means the mean forecast understates the central tendency for those tracts relative to the median.
- Do high emerging scores predict strong 5-year price appreciation?
- Not necessarily. The top four emerging tracts, Roswell (29.62%), West Campus (17.37%), Westchase (23.42%), and Medical Center (25.06%), all carry 5-year forecasts below the 37.01% cap, while several lower-ranked emerging tracts carry forecasts at the cap. The emerging score measures recent demographic acceleration; the 5-year forecast measures expected price momentum, and the two signals are analytically distinct.
- What is the national median 5-year forecast across all scoreable tracts?
- Across the 82,179 scoreable U.S. census tracts, the national median 5-year forecast is 30.48%. The 10th percentile is 15.7% and the 75th and 90th percentiles are both 37.01%, reflecting the compression of the upper tail against the forecast cap.
- Which metro shows the widest spread between its 10th-percentile and median forecast, among the 13 curated launch metros?
- Houston shows a 10th-percentile forecast of 14.0% against a median of 32.21%, a spread of 18.21 percentage points, the second-widest gap between those two percentiles among the 13 curated launch metros, behind Atlanta at 19.34 percentage points. That wide dispersion is consistent with Houston also contributing four of the 15 ranked emerging tracts, including two in the top four.
Methodology
Forecasts are produced by the Verus-AI model from tract-level Census demographic, employment, and market inputs. The five-year figure is a cumulative point forecast for 2025-2029; confidence bands reflect in-sample model uncertainty only and do not capture macroeconomic shocks, policy changes, or idiosyncratic events. Gross rent yield is derived from ACS tract-level median gross rent; tracts with suppressed or sentinel ACS rent values are shown as n/a. Rankings reflect the model's point estimates (model data as of 2026-05-10) and are not investment advice. Tracts retired in the post-2020 Census geometry are excluded where coverage is insufficient.